Australia at war with Facebook and Google
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:49 am
Zuckerberg's company, for its part, took much more drastic measures in this matter. As they indicate, this law goes against the relationship maintained between them and the media, where the latter are the most benefited. According to Easton, both platforms have presented a different response, due to the essential difference between their relationships with the media.
« This debate has focused on American tech companies and how they profit from news content on their services. We understand that many will wonder why platforms might respond differently. The answer is that our platforms have fundamentally different relationships with news. Google search is inextricably intertwined with news, and publishers do not voluntarily provide their content. On the other hand , publishers voluntarily choose to publish news on Facebook, as it allows them to sell more subscriptions, grow their audiences, and increase advertising revenue .»
Additionally, Facebook notes in its statement that its guatemala business email database earnings from news are minimal, at just 4%. This is to support its claim that its business relationship with the media is biased in its favor.
What consequences could this decision bring?
Meanwhile, Australian Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said at the time that he was in talks with Mark Zuckerberg about the situation.
Similar situations have already occurred in Europe, where search engines are seeking to pay media outlets for news links.
However, the situation had not reached the extremes seen in Australia. Similarly, in an era where the fight against disinformation is constant, especially on platforms such as Facebook.
« This debate has focused on American tech companies and how they profit from news content on their services. We understand that many will wonder why platforms might respond differently. The answer is that our platforms have fundamentally different relationships with news. Google search is inextricably intertwined with news, and publishers do not voluntarily provide their content. On the other hand , publishers voluntarily choose to publish news on Facebook, as it allows them to sell more subscriptions, grow their audiences, and increase advertising revenue .»
Additionally, Facebook notes in its statement that its guatemala business email database earnings from news are minimal, at just 4%. This is to support its claim that its business relationship with the media is biased in its favor.
What consequences could this decision bring?
Meanwhile, Australian Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said at the time that he was in talks with Mark Zuckerberg about the situation.
Similar situations have already occurred in Europe, where search engines are seeking to pay media outlets for news links.
However, the situation had not reached the extremes seen in Australia. Similarly, in an era where the fight against disinformation is constant, especially on platforms such as Facebook.