The system will be available to Google partners for beta testing at the end of April
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 3:52 am
Subscribe to our Telegram channel to stay up to date with all the news and events of the Runet.
Main_10850307_10204885690917959_3778352964555541467_n
Artem Krashennikov
SMM specialist
"Shaggy Cheese"
<p>"For regular Instagram users, the perception of the feed will not chang list of qatar cell phone numbers in any way, since after a couple of scrolls down the feed, you stop paying attention to the chronology. If you are motivated to look at the content of a specific user, you can simply go to their profile, where everything is in chronological order.</p>
<p>As for corporate accounts, the main disadvantage here so far seems to be the boosting of likes. If now this is done simply to attract new followers, then with the innovation, boosting will be necessary to bring accounts to the top. The algorithm will have to fight this too.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that Instagram does not have a rebroadcasting tool, which is why the content does not have a viral effect. Therefore, the top of the feed will be filled with more interesting user content, and the innovation will stimulate brands to buy official advertising.</p>
<p>If we talk about the benefits of this algorithm in Tw, since viral content rarely falls out of the active user's field of vision. Simply put, someone's friends are very likely to see a repost. In addition, the algorithm has killed Twitter's inherent efficiency in distributing important messages. In the event of an emergency, instead of prompt information, a person will first be offered to read a funny story published 19 hours ago.</p>
<p>One of the main reasons that VK uses chronological order by default (in addition to historical order) is the advertising exchange. This order allows communities to guarantee the advertiser a certain audience reach, which affects pricing.</p>
<p>But it is impossible to say unequivocally that VK is losing popularity because of this. Facebook is better suited for public discussions on a certain trend/phenomenon than VK. Here it is appropriate to draw an analogy with, may it rest in peace, LiveJournal. But VK, due to its more developed communities, allows several thousand people to become potential participants in the discussion in a few minutes (due to the streaming output of information)"</p>
Main_10850307_10204885690917959_3778352964555541467_n
Artem Krashennikov
SMM specialist
"Shaggy Cheese"
<p>"For regular Instagram users, the perception of the feed will not chang list of qatar cell phone numbers in any way, since after a couple of scrolls down the feed, you stop paying attention to the chronology. If you are motivated to look at the content of a specific user, you can simply go to their profile, where everything is in chronological order.</p>
<p>As for corporate accounts, the main disadvantage here so far seems to be the boosting of likes. If now this is done simply to attract new followers, then with the innovation, boosting will be necessary to bring accounts to the top. The algorithm will have to fight this too.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that Instagram does not have a rebroadcasting tool, which is why the content does not have a viral effect. Therefore, the top of the feed will be filled with more interesting user content, and the innovation will stimulate brands to buy official advertising.</p>
<p>If we talk about the benefits of this algorithm in Tw, since viral content rarely falls out of the active user's field of vision. Simply put, someone's friends are very likely to see a repost. In addition, the algorithm has killed Twitter's inherent efficiency in distributing important messages. In the event of an emergency, instead of prompt information, a person will first be offered to read a funny story published 19 hours ago.</p>
<p>One of the main reasons that VK uses chronological order by default (in addition to historical order) is the advertising exchange. This order allows communities to guarantee the advertiser a certain audience reach, which affects pricing.</p>
<p>But it is impossible to say unequivocally that VK is losing popularity because of this. Facebook is better suited for public discussions on a certain trend/phenomenon than VK. Here it is appropriate to draw an analogy with, may it rest in peace, LiveJournal. But VK, due to its more developed communities, allows several thousand people to become potential participants in the discussion in a few minutes (due to the streaming output of information)"</p>