Problems of maintaining reference information
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2024 9:17 am
Maintaining NSI at an enterprise is associated with a number of important problems, such as the lack of a unified approach and methodology, duplication of positions, the human factor and lack of control.
Lack of a unified approach
The greatest difficulties arise from the lack of a unified approach. In this case, business processes in the company are not regulated. Any business process in the enterprise must have clear regulations.
When implementing business processes, company numbers (south korean tv series) employees must follow established regulations that describe the procedure for actions in certain situations, the organization of group work, the appointment of responsible persons, and the deadlines for completing the plan.
When an enterprise's activities are not based on a single set of regulations, the workflow is disrupted, the workload is not distributed correctly, delays occur, etc.
Lack of a unified methodology
The lack of a unified approach logically leads to another problem in maintaining NSI at an enterprise – the lack of methodology.
The methodology defines the regulations for working with reference information databases:
principles of constructing a classifier hierarchy;
rules for maintaining categories (groups, templates);
the procedure for making changes to the classifier;
rules for classification and normalization of positions.
The lack of a methodology subsequently leads to serious errors when working with data, and therefore when creating reports, accounting for finished products, and in other areas.
Duplicates
Another problem is related to the occurrence of duplicates when entering reference information. For example, the same product may be found under different names, or its characteristics may differ slightly from each other. The lack of a unified approach contributes to an increase in the number of duplicates and the overflow of the reference book with unnecessary entries, which makes working with it very difficult.
Duplicates
Source: shutterstock.com
Example . The nomenclature includes the position "nylon plastic clamp", which is also known as ties. This creates a problem: when entering data, both clamp and tie can be indicated as the name. Therefore, if the enterprise does not have regulations on which department can add the nomenclature to the directory, there is a risk of duplicates.
For example :
one employee wrote "clamp" in the reference book, and another - "tie";
One employee chose the noun "nylon" and another chose the adjective "nylon".
In such conditions, it is possible for multiple duplicates to be distributed, and additional difficulties are caused by the human factor: trivial errors, typos, unsuccessful abbreviations, different ways of indicating size, etc.
The presence of duplicates in reference books hinders the normal operation of the enterprise, in particular, preventing full control over the movement of inventory items.
Let's imagine a situation where seven units of clamps were distributed across several reference books as separate items. Consequently, they were sent to different warehouses and are not considered as one item.
This creates difficulties when searching for the required clamp in the warehouse. Due to the ambiguous indication of the position, its use, accounting in the work process, etc. become impossible.
Lack of a unified approach
The greatest difficulties arise from the lack of a unified approach. In this case, business processes in the company are not regulated. Any business process in the enterprise must have clear regulations.
When implementing business processes, company numbers (south korean tv series) employees must follow established regulations that describe the procedure for actions in certain situations, the organization of group work, the appointment of responsible persons, and the deadlines for completing the plan.
When an enterprise's activities are not based on a single set of regulations, the workflow is disrupted, the workload is not distributed correctly, delays occur, etc.
Lack of a unified methodology
The lack of a unified approach logically leads to another problem in maintaining NSI at an enterprise – the lack of methodology.
The methodology defines the regulations for working with reference information databases:
principles of constructing a classifier hierarchy;
rules for maintaining categories (groups, templates);
the procedure for making changes to the classifier;
rules for classification and normalization of positions.
The lack of a methodology subsequently leads to serious errors when working with data, and therefore when creating reports, accounting for finished products, and in other areas.
Duplicates
Another problem is related to the occurrence of duplicates when entering reference information. For example, the same product may be found under different names, or its characteristics may differ slightly from each other. The lack of a unified approach contributes to an increase in the number of duplicates and the overflow of the reference book with unnecessary entries, which makes working with it very difficult.
Duplicates
Source: shutterstock.com
Example . The nomenclature includes the position "nylon plastic clamp", which is also known as ties. This creates a problem: when entering data, both clamp and tie can be indicated as the name. Therefore, if the enterprise does not have regulations on which department can add the nomenclature to the directory, there is a risk of duplicates.
For example :
one employee wrote "clamp" in the reference book, and another - "tie";
One employee chose the noun "nylon" and another chose the adjective "nylon".
In such conditions, it is possible for multiple duplicates to be distributed, and additional difficulties are caused by the human factor: trivial errors, typos, unsuccessful abbreviations, different ways of indicating size, etc.
The presence of duplicates in reference books hinders the normal operation of the enterprise, in particular, preventing full control over the movement of inventory items.
Let's imagine a situation where seven units of clamps were distributed across several reference books as separate items. Consequently, they were sent to different warehouses and are not considered as one item.
This creates difficulties when searching for the required clamp in the warehouse. Due to the ambiguous indication of the position, its use, accounting in the work process, etc. become impossible.