Why is it defective?
Assigning tasks to AI is not fundamentally russia phone numbers different from delegating them to humans. Both require consistent and precise instructions to achieve quality results. The process of directing AI is primarily about providing it with knowledge. It is 1% about asking and 99% about providing knowledge to AI.
Want quality content? Give AI a broad context, just like you would normally give a human. We've never shied away from the task, and neither should you. The more accurate and comprehensive your guidelines are, the better the chances of getting satisfying content. When we create articles, we input about 7,000 words for every 3,000 words produced. This ratio dramatically influences the quality of the output. It's a long-held rule of programmers: " Basura dentro, basura fuera " - time to apply it to our use of AI.
Sure, AI can freak out. It can make stuff up or get overly creative. BUT the content doesn't have to be shallow. It's largely up to you. Expecting A-grade narratives or ranking articles from minimal data will always lead to disappointment. Lower quality input equals lower quality output.