Monorepo vs Multi-Repo: Advantages and Disadvantages of Code Repository Strategies

[mouakter13]

There are two main strategies for hosting and managing code via Git: monorepo vs multi-repo. Both approaches have their pros and cons.

We can use either approach for any codebase in any language. You can use either strategy for projects containing anything from a handful of libraries to thousands. Even if you have just a few team members or hundreds, or if you want to host private or open source code, you can opt for monorepo or multi-repo based on several factors.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach? When should we use one or the other? Let's find out.

What are repositories?
A repo (short for repository) is a repository for all of a taiwan whatsapp number data project's changes and files, allowing developers to "version control" the project's assets throughout its development stage.

We're usually referring to Git repositories (such as those provided by GitHub , GitLab, or Bitbucket ), but the concept also applies to other version control systems (such as Mercurial).

What is a monorepo?
The monorepo approach uses a single repository to house all the code for the multiple libraries or services that make up a company’s projects. In its most extreme version, a company’s entire codebase – spanning multiple projects and coded in different languages ​​– is housed in a single repository.

The Benefits of Monorepo
Hosting the entire codebase in a single repository offers the following advantages.

Reduces barriers to entry
When new staff members start working in a company, they need to download the code and install the necessary tools to start working on their tasks. Let's suppose that the project is scattered across many repositories, each with its installation instructions and the necessary tools. In that case, the initial setup will be complex and, in most cases, the documentation will not be complete, forcing these new team members to ask their colleagues for help.