In this new era, innovation and technology have retained a central, but redefined, place. They are no longer ends in themselves, but tools at the service of the ecological transition and the harmonious coexistence between man and nature. A common European framework has been set up to assess the externalities of companies, with sanctions for irresponsible behavior and rewards for virtuous initiatives. There will still be a long way to go, particularly to achieve a real balance in the second half of the century, but the work has been launched in an ambitious manner and aims to bring together around a common project – and this is perhaps the most important thing.
In this future, individualistic hedonism has long dominated, leading to a collective inability to face major challenges. Rather than engage in deep reforms, society has chosen superficial adjustments, which has precipitated it into a spiral of repeated crises. Today, it finds itself like a poorly engaged hurdler, reacting turkey phone number list defensively to each new obstacle. In France, life expectancy is falling, a sign of growing vulnerability to climate crises, aggravated by growing inequalities in the capacity to cope with them.
Governments and businesses, caught up in the emergency, devote most of their resources to managing immediate crises, often ineffectively. The better-off can protect themselves individually against upheaval, while the majority suffer the consequences of disasters and reconstruction. The population, tired of repeated crises, sinks into pessimism and gives up any prospect of the future.
Some groups, especially composed of young people, however, refuse this inevitability. These activists, often perceived as radical and at odds with the majority, seek to awaken consciences. They adopt extreme methods, attacking those responsible whom they consider guilty of the collapse. Their dream of another world nevertheless remains marginal, out of step with a population that considers them too utopian or violent.
At the same time, the ongoing chaos leads some to seek refuge in religion, which is gaining influence. Others, seeking stability, turn to strong authority figures, hoping to restore order in the chaos. Democracy is increasingly seen as ineffective in times of crisis, and in some countries, authoritarian regimes have emerged. Relying on sophisticated algorithms and massive data collection, these governments justify brutal decisions that are supposed to serve the public interest. Populations, seeking solutions in the face of collapse, often accept these sacrifices, hoping that this control will pave the way for a more stable future, although this authoritarian model of power stifles criticism and dissent.