CAD tools and some compar

[shamimhasan07]

AutoCAD vs Revit Review and Comparison. Pros and Cons and Comparative Characteristics of Both Programs for Designers
Despite the fact that many designers and BIM managers encourage their colleagues to try Revit, low-power specialists continue to work in AutoCAD. The reason for this is the lack of free time to master new technologies due to the large volume of work.

In this situation, a short review-comparison of AutoCAD and Revit would not hurt. This telefonnummer iran is exactly the comparison that was conducted by Alexander Katyunin, head of the SS design department at AO Sibpromproekt.

What does the formation of a CC project require?
The amount of information required for designing a SS is simply enormous: you need to know SPDS, GOST, SP, keep in mind the requirements of the customer and manufacturers, be able to work in CAD and understand the difference between different systems.

The choice of CAD depends not only on what the customer wants. For various reasons, the choice of CAD also depends on the designer.


ative characteristicsAutoCAD and Revit: Pros and Cons
Alexander Katyunin emphasized that the comparison will be useful primarily for those designers who are just deciding which system to work in.

Among the unconditional advantages of AutoCAD we can note:

A large list of tools that provide modeling in 2D space
Built-in programming language Autolisp
There has been a large database of drawings on the market for a long time.
Supported by manufacturers in 2D design
What are the downsides?

Few tools for information modeling
Low interactivity
Compared to AutoCAD, Revit has many more advantages, and they are also much more extensive:

A huge list of tools applicable in 3D
Has a built-in programming language DesignScript
There has been a large base of CC families on the market for a long time now.
Actively supported by manufacturers
Highly interactive (if you change information in one place, you don’t have to track these changes in another place)
What are the downsides?

In 2D design in Revit there is only detail line
What conclusions can be drawn after comparing the characteristics:

At the initial stages of design in Revit, you can use the AutoCAD program and load drawings from it into Revit. That is, use the capabilities of creating 2D graphics of AutoCAD in Revit.

For what documents can you use AutoCAD if you design in Revit?
When forming structural and functional diagrams, as well as connection diagrams, Alexander Katyunin used AutoCAD. For developing text documents, depending on how deep the automation was when working with text documents, he resorted to Revit.

If we compare the amount of "human factor", that is, the data that needs to be controlled manually in programs, then Revit wins over AutoCAD with a score of 9:15. There are common documents that need to be checked in both places.

For example, such as: explanatory note, UGO, connection diagram, etc. But if you compare the total amount of controlled documentation, you can say unequivocally: errors are made much more often in AutoCAD.